BRIDGES [C] |
Between 2000 and 2003, the percentage of the nation's 590,750 bridges rated structurally deficient or functionally obsolete decreased slightly from 28.5% to 27.1%. However, it will cost $9.4 billion a year for 20 years to eliminate all bridge deficiencies. Long-term underinvestment is compounded by the lack of a Federal transportation program.
As of 2003, 27.1% of the nation's bridges (160,570) were structurally deficient or functionally obsolete, an improvement from 28.5% in 2000. In fact, over the past 12 years, the number of bridge deficiencies has steadily declined from 34.6% in 1992 to 27.1% in 2003. The Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA's) strategic plan states that by 2008, less than 25% of the nation's bridges should be classified as deficient. If that goal were met, 1 in 4 bridges in the nation would still be deficient. There were 590,750 bridges in the United States in 2000; however, one in three urban bridges (31.2% or 43,189) was classified as structurally deficient or functionally obsolete, much higher than the national average. In contrast, 25.6% (118,381) of rural bridges were classified as structurally deficient or functionally obsolete.
A structurally deficient bridge is closed or restricted to light vehicles because of its deteriorated structural components. While not necessarily unsafe, these bridges must have limits for speed and weight. A functionally obsolete bridge has older design features and, while it is not unsafe for all vehicles, it cannot safely accommodate current traffic volumes, and vehicle sizes and weights. These restrictions not only contribute to traffic congestion, they pose such major inconveniences as school busses or emergency vehicles taking lengthy detours. It is estimated that it will cost $9.4 billion per year for 20 years to eliminate all bridge deficiencies. The annual investment required to prevent the bridge investment backlog from increasing is estimated at $7.3 billion. Present funding trends of state departments of transportation call into question future progress on addressing bridge deficiencies.
Adding to these problems is the inability of the Administration and Congress to reauthorize the nation's Transportation Equity Act of the 21st Century (TEA-21), which has now had six extensions since the program expired on September 30, 2003. The progress made in the TEA-21, which authorized $218 billion for the nation's highway and transit programs in 2001, is beginning to slip as America continues to shortchange funding for much-needed road and bridge repairs.
Even with uncertain funding due to the lack of a federal transportation funds reauthorization bill, additional revenues from state and local governments have begun to make an impact on bridge projects in all 50 states. Total bridge expenditures by all levels of government for capital outlays (including system preservation and system expansion) was at $8.8 billion in 2003.
Policy Options
Solutions intended to ease the increasing demands on our transportation system and to improve highway conditions, capacity and safety are multifaceted, and do not always mean simply building more roads and bridges. America must change its transportation behavior, increase transportation investment at all levels of government, and make use of the latest technology. Cities and communities should be better planned to reduce dependence on personal vehicles for errands and work commutes, and businesses must encourage more flexible schedules and telecommuting.
By 2010, all levels of government should ensure that fewer than 15% of the nation's bridges are classified as structurally deficient or functionally obsolete.
Congress must fully re-authorize TEA-21 before it expires again in May 2005. Congress also must use all of the money that accumulates in the Highway Trust Fund to support investment in the nation's surface transportation program and protect the trust fund from abuse by removing it from the unified budget. Congress must provide adequate funding to meet current highway and transit bridge needs, and include enough funding for research and development of civil engineering innovations that offer cost-effective solutions to our transportation needs. Other solutions include private-public partnerships where appropriate, and multi-year capital and operating budgets.
Specific recommendations supported by The American Society of Civil Engineers:
- Set a national goal that fewer than 15% of the nation's bridges be classified as structurally deficient or functionally obsolete by 2010
- Reauthorize TEA-21 for at least five years, using a needs-based approach to arrive at the funding level
- Remove the Highway Trust Fund from the unified federal budget
- Increase funding for long-term fundamental highway research efforts at the national level
- Establish of a federal, multi-year capital budget for public works infrastructure construction and rehabilitation, similar to those used by state and local governments
- Encourage the use of life-cycle cost analysis principles to evaluate the total costs of projects
- Support environmental streamlining of transportation projects
Sources
The Road Information Project, Key Facts America's Road and Bridge Conditions and Federal Funding, 2004
U.S. Department of Transportation, 2002 Status of the Nation's Highways, Bridges, and Transit: Conditions and Performance, 2003
U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, Transportation Statistics Annual Report, 2003
U.S. Department of Transportation, Highway Statistics, 2003
Texas Transportation Institute, Urban Mobility Study, 2003
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, The Bottom Line, 2002
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Strategic Highway Safety Plan, September 2000
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, "State DOT's TEA-21 Success Stories," AASHTO Quarterly, Spring, 1999
ASCE Policy Statement 382, "Transportation Funding," 2004
ASCE Policy Statement 434, "Transportation Trust Funds," 2003
ASCE Policy Statement 367, "Highway Safety," 2002
ASCE Policy Statement 149, "Intermodal Transportation Systems," 2002
ASCE Policy Statement 208, "Bridge Safety," 2004
ASCE Policy Statement 496, "Innovative Financing for Transportation Projects" 2004
ASCE Policy Statement 454, "Intelligent Transportation Systems," 2002
ASCE Policy Statement 276, "Integrated Truck and Highway Design," 2003
ASCE Resolution 501, "Next Generation National Transportation Policy Study Commission," 2004
ASCE Policy Statement 495, "Operations and Maintenance of Transportation Systems," 2002
ASCE Policy Statement 497, "Surface Transportation Research Funding," 2002




